The Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TG-RERA) has imposed a fine of ₹10.6 lakh on a construction company for violating the approved project plans at an apartment complex in Nizampet, Hyderabad. The penalty follows complaints from the apartment owners’ cooperative maintenance society, which accused the developer of altering the project’s layout and limiting access to promised amenities.

The society, representing the residents, alleged that the developer made changes to the originally approved plan by constructing a boundary wall that blocked access to common facilities. The project was marketed with the promise of a 60,000 sq. ft. clubhouse, which was to feature a supermarket, commercial spaces, guest rooms, a function hall, a gym, and a yoga center. However, the society claimed that the developer erected a compound wall around the clubhouse, preventing residents from using the space as intended and modifying its purpose.

In addition, the developer allegedly removed landscaped greenery in front of the amenities block and was attempting to sell parts of the clubhouse to third parties. These actions, according to the society, contradicted the project details advertised at the time of purchase and the permissions granted by the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA).

After investigating the case, TG-RERA ruled in favor of the residents, imposing the fine and ordering the developer to pay the penalty to the TG-RERA Fund within 30 days. The regulatory authority also issued several directives:

• Removal of the Boundary Wall: The developer must demolish the wall that restricts access and restore the clubhouse for the exclusive use of the residents.
• Adherence to the Approved Plan: Construction must strictly follow the original plan approved by HMDA.
• Installation of Renewable Energy Systems: The developer is required to install solar lighting and a solar water heating system, in line with government regulations for high-rise buildings.

TG-RERA clarified that the developer could collect additional funds from the allottees for completing any pending work, but all modifications must align with the approved plans.

This case underscores the growing oversight on real estate developers in Telangana and highlights the role of RERA in ensuring compliance. Deviations from approved plans have been a recurring issue in residential projects, often leading to disputes between developers and homeowners. Regulatory intervention, such as in this case, is aimed at ensuring that homebuyers receive the amenities and facilities promised during the sales process.

While TG-RERA’s orders are legally binding, the challenge lies in enforcement. The effectiveness of the penalty and corrective actions will depend on the developer’s willingness to comply and the authority’s ability to follow up.